Regarding turbine blade serviceability, which statement is true?

The assertion that serviceability limits for turbine blades are much more stringent than for turbine nozzle vanes is accurate because turbine blades operate under significantly higher stress and thermal loads than nozzle vanes. As a result, any damage or imperfections in blades, such as cracks or deformations, could lead to severe performance issues, catastrophic failures, or safety risks.

In aviation, maintaining the integrity of turbine blades is crucial, as they directly affect engine performance and efficiency. The stringent requirements ensure that even minor defects are addressed before they can lead to larger failures, which is essential for the safety of the aircraft and its passengers.

Conversely, turbine nozzle vanes, while still critical, do not experience the same level of dynamic and thermal stress as turbine blades. Thus, the serviceability limits for them can be more lenient, allowing for a slightly broader range of acceptable conditions. This distinction is rooted in the different roles and operating conditions of blades versus vanes in the engine cycle.